CA2475323C - Url based filtering of electronic communications and web pages - Google Patents

Url based filtering of electronic communications and web pages Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2475323C
CA2475323C CA2475323A CA2475323A CA2475323C CA 2475323 C CA2475323 C CA 2475323C CA 2475323 A CA2475323 A CA 2475323A CA 2475323 A CA2475323 A CA 2475323A CA 2475323 C CA2475323 C CA 2475323C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
identified
urls
electronic communication
url
email
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA2475323A
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2475323A1 (en
Inventor
Alan Packer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Corp
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microsoft Corp, Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC filed Critical Microsoft Corp
Publication of CA2475323A1 publication Critical patent/CA2475323A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA2475323C publication Critical patent/CA2475323C/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/953Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
    • G06F16/9536Search customisation based on social or collaborative filtering
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/953Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
    • G06F16/9535Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F15/00Digital computers in general; Data processing equipment in general
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/953Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
    • G06F16/9538Presentation of query results
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity

Abstract

A system and method for handling an electronic communication such as an email, an instant message or a chat room statement. Instructions receive and parse the electronic communication. URLs within the parsed electronic communication are identified and categorized as appropriate or inappropriate. The electronic communication is routed as a function of the categorized URLs-appropriate electronic communications are routed to the addressee; inappropriate electronic communications have controlled access. Also included is a system and method for controlling access by third parties to web pages including instructions for parsing a web page, identifying URLs within the parsed web page, categorizing the identified URLs, and permitting third parties to access the web page as a function of the categorized URLs.

Description

URL BASED FILTERING OF ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATIONS AND WEB PAGES
TECHNICAL FIELD
[ 0001 ] Embodiments of the present invention relate to the field of communications filtering based on content and web page management and control based on content. In particular, embodiments of this invention relate to evaluating the appropriateness of a particular electronic communication or a web page of a website based on its content.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[ 0002] Any internet application is a candidate for abuse and annoyance by spammers who solicit visitors for their websites. In addition to sending email and other communications, spammers also target chat rooms and instant messaging programs by writing "bots" (programs designed to act like a person) that try to solicit visitors to websites. In addition, solicitors disguise the actual content of their websites by giving the site a front or look which would appear to be more appropriate in order to sell products and/or services that are inappropriate.
[ 0003 ] Pornographic email and spam are becoming increasingly offensive to clients, with hypertext markup language (HTML) based messages containing graphic images and descriptions sent to millions of users regardless of their age or interests. Similarly, chat rooms and instant messaging programs are targeted by spammers, who write "bots" (programs designed to act like a person) that try to solicit visitors to websites. The solicitations are not always pornographic ¨ they may be any type of unsolicited commercial offering - offers to purchase Viagra or other prescription drugs, applications for credit cards, or weight loss programs for example.
[ 0004 ] Some known systems develop lists of appropriate and inappropriate website and sources of electronic communication. However, these systems can be circumvented by spammers that vary their source address or hide the content that they are offering.
[ 0005) Usability studies indicate pornographic email, spam, arid pornographic solicitations in messaging applications and in chat rooms are a major cause of dissatisfaction and churn to users. There is a need to address this problem in order to improve the user's experience. Controlling such electronic communications
2 and websites translates into lower churn and higher revenues for internet service providers.
[ 0006] Accordingly, a system for filtering electronic communications and websites is desired to address one or more of these and other disadvantages.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0007] Electronic communications and web pages of inappropriate content tend to share a common characteristic: they contain URLs (uniform resource locators) that, when selected, deliver the client to the spammer's web page.
One embodiment of the invention involves parsing electronic communications and web pages in applications that are not primarily for the function of viewing web pages, searching for URLs, and using a software development kit called the Online Lookup Toolkit to look up the URLs. If a sufficient number, rating or percentage of the URLs are categorized as "inappropriate," such a electronic communication is either blocked or logged for parental examination. If a sufficient number, rating or percentage of the URLs of a web page are categorized as "inappropriate," such URLs are either segregated, removed or blocked.
[ 0008] Microsoft Corporation owns a very large database of categorized URLs, used for MSN's Parental Controls and web content filtering. The database contains nearly 30 million URLs, representing public web pages on the World Wide Web, and category labels indicating membership in "inappropriate" categories, i.e.
categories of content inappropriate for viewing by children. These categories include pornography, hate speech, mature content, drugs, etc. In the future, the categories may include those favored by spammers, such as Viagra sales, credit card offers, etc.
The contents of the database are served up online through custom lookup servers, called Category Name Service servers, or CNS servers. Applications access the lookup servers with a software development kit (SDK) called the Online Lookup Toolkit. The system is called the Online Lookup Service, or OLS.
[ 0009] In the case of email, one embodiment of the invention involves scanning email messages at either the mail server or mail client, before delivering them to the addressee. For instant messaging or chat rooms, individual test messages can be intercepted either at the time a client (or a bot masquerading as a client) sends the message, or before delivery to the message's recipient. In the case of web pages, one embodiment of the invention involves evaluating the content of the web page. If
3 the text message or web page contains one or more URLs, they can be extracted and looked up against the OLS, and the message can be blocked as inappropriate or allowed as appropriate.
[0010] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a system provides for handling an electronic communication. The system includes instructions for:
receiving the communication;
parsing the received communication;
identifying URLs within the parsed communication;
categorizing the identified URLs; and routing the communication as a function of the categorized URLs.
[0011] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a system provides for controlling access by third parties to web pages of a website.
The system includes instructions for:
parsing pages within a website;
identifying URLs within the parsed web pages;
categorizing the identified URLs; and permitting third parties to access the web pages as a function of the categorized URLs.
[0012] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a system provides for handling an email. The system includes instructions for:
receiving the email;
parsing the received email;
identifying URLs within the parsed email;
looking up a rating for each of the identified URLs;
designating certain of the identified URLs as inappropriate assigning a number to each identified URL based on its appropriateness; and permitting the client to access the email when the assigned number or the number of inappropriate URLs is below a threshold.
[0013] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a system provides for handling an email. The system includes instructions for:
receiving the email;
parsing the received email;
identifying URLs within the parsed email;
4 looking up a rating for each of the identified URLs;
designating certain of the identified URLs as inappropriate or assigning a number to each identified URL based on its inappropriateness; and inhibiting the client to access the email when the assigned number or the number of inappropriate URLs is at or above the threshold.
[ 0014] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a client side hardware system is provided. The system includes a client computer having a memory and having capability for receiving electronic communications from a source for presentation to a client. The system further includes:
instructions for receiving electronic communications from a source and storing the received electronic communications in the memory while initially inhibiting client access to the electronic communications;
instructions for categorizing the stored electronic communications based on the URLs therein; and instructions for permitting client access to a particular electronic communication as a function of the category of the electronic communication.
[ 0015] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a server side hardware system is provided. The system includes a server computer having a memory and having capability for receiving electronic communications from a source for presentation to a client. The system further includes:
instructions for receiving electronic communications from a source and storing the received electronic communications in the memory;
instructions for categorizing the stored electronic communications based on the URLs therein; and instructions for selectively sending a particular electronic communication to the client as a function of the categorization of the electronic communication.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a server side hardware system is provided. The system includes a server computer presenting a plurality of websites having web pages on a network and having the capability of controlling a client's access to the pages of the websites. The system further includes:
instructions for periodically categorizing the web pages based on URLs therein; and instructions for permitting client access to a particular web page as a function of the categorization of the web page.
[ 0016] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a computer readable medium for handling an electronic communication is provided. The medium includes instructions for:
receiving the communication;
parsing the received communication;
identifying URLs within the parsed communication;
categorizing the identified URLs; and routing the communication as a function of the categorized URLs.
[0017] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a computer readable medium for controlling access by third parties to web pages of a website is proved. The medium includes instructions for:
parsing pages within a website;
identifying URLs within the parsed web pages;
categorizing the identified URLs; and permitting third parties to access the web pages as a function of the categorized URLs.
[0018] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a computer readable medium for handling an email is provided. The medium includes instructions for:
receiving the email;
parsing the received email;
identifying URLs within the parsed email;
looking up a rating for each of the identified URLs;
designating certain of the identified URLs as inappropriate or assigning a number to each identified U'RL based on its inappropriateness; and permitting the client to access the email when the assigned number or the number of inappropriate URLs is below a threshold or inhibiting the client to access the email when the assigned number or the number of inappropriate URLs is at or above the threshold.
[0019] Alternatively, one embodiment of the invention may comprise various other methods and apparatuses.
paow....*Wc _________________________ 1.0 = 51214-3 5a According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for handling an electronic commercial, said system comprising: a computer processor and; a computer readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, that when executed by the computer processor, perform a method comprising: receiving the electronic communication; parsing the received electronic communication to identify URLs within the received electronic communication;
for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each identified URL, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the identified URL and to maintain URL
categories; rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of the identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and routing the electronic communication as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the electronic communication is not routed to an addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the electronic communication is routed to the addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the routing includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided, a system for controlling access by third parties to web pages of a website, said system comprising: a computer processor; a computer readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, that when executed by the computer processor, s 51214-3 5b perform a method comprising: parsing pages within a website; identifying URLs within the parsed web pages; categorizing the identified URLs by looking up the category of each identified URL via a categorizing server system; rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and permitting a third party to access the web pages as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the third party is blocked from accessing the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the third party is permitted to access the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for handling an email, said system comprising: a computer processor; a computer readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, that when executed by the computer processor, perform a method comprising:
receiving the email for presentation to a client; parsing the received email to identify URLs within the parsed email; looking up a rating for each of the identified URLs via a categorizing server system; designating each identified URL as inappropriate or appropriate based on the rating of each identified URL; permitting the client to access the email when the percentage of designated inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of designated inappropriate URLs of the email and designated appropriate URLs of the email is below a threshold; and inhibiting the client to access the email when the percentage of designated inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the = 51214-3 5c total of designated inappropriate URLs of the email and designated appropriate URLs of the email is at or above the threshold, wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the email to the client when the policy indicates that the email passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the email to the client when the policy indicates that the email fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a client side hardware system comprising: a client computer having a memory and having capability for receiving electronic communications from a source for presentation to a client; instructions for receiving an electronic communication from the source and storing the received electronic communication in the memory while initially inhibiting client access to the electronic communication;
instructions for categorizing the stored electronic communication based on the URLs therein by looking up the category of each identified URL via a categorizing server system, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL
and to maintain URL categories; instructions for rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of the identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and instructions for routing the electronic communication as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the client is not permitted access to the electronic communication if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the client is permitted access to the electronic communication if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the instructions for permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block 5d logic and which determines to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the email fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a server side hardware system comprising: a server computer having a memory and having capability for receiving electronic communications from a source for presentation to a client, said electronic communication comprises one or more of the following: an email, an instant message or a chat room statement, said server being configured with executable instructions for: defining a threshold value;
receiving an electronic communication from a source and storing the received electronic communication in the memory; parsing the received electronic communication to identify URLs within the parsed electronic communication; for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each identified URL, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL and to maintain URL categories; rating the stored electronic communication as appropriate or inappropriate based on the assigned category of the each identified URL; and selectively sending the electronic communication to the client as a function of the rating of the electronic communication, wherein the electronic communication is not routed to the client if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than the threshold value, and wherein the electronic communication is routed to the client if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is less than or equal to the threshold value, and wherein the instructions for routing include a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determine to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the client = 51214-3 5e when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to yet a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a server side hardware system comprising: a server computer presenting a plurality of websites having web pages on a network and having the capability of controlling a client's access to the web pages of the websites; instructions for periodically rating a web page based on categories of the URLs therein, said categories of the URLs identified by a categorizing server system employing a URL
database to cross reference the URL and maintain URL categories; instructions for rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of identified category corresponding to each identified URL; instructions for routing the web page to the client as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the client is not permitted access to the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the client is permitted access to the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the instructions for permitting include a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the web page to the client when the policy indicates that the web page passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determine to inhibit routing the web page to the client when the policy indicates that the web page fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to still a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer readable storage medium for handling an electronic communication, said medium including instructions stored thereon, when executed by a computer processor, to perform a method of: receiving the electronic communication for presentation to a client; parsing the received electronic communication to identify URLs within the parsed electronic communication; for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the = 51214-3 5f category assigned to each of the identified URLs by looking up the category of each identified URL via a categorizing server system, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL and maintain URL
categories;
designating each identified URL as inappropriate or appropriate based on its category; permitting the client to access the electronic communication when the percentage of inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is below a threshold; and inhibiting the client to access the electronic communication when the percentage of inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is at or above the threshold, and wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determine to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer readable storage medium for controlling access by third parties to web pages of a website, said medium including instructions stored thereon, when executed by a computer processor, to perform a method of: parsing web pages within a website to identify URLs within the parsed web pages; for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category of the identified URLs, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL and maintain URL categories; rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and permitting a third party to access the web pages as a function of the rating of the URLs, wherein the third party is blocked from accessing the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page = 51214-3 5g relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the third party is permitted to access the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer readable storage medium for handling an email, said medium including instructions stored thereon, when executed by a computer processor, to perform a method of: receiving the email; parsing the received email;
identifying URLs within the parsed email; for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each identified URL, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL and maintain URL categories; rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate based on the identified categories of the identified URLs; and routing the email as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the email is not routed to an addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the email and identified appropriate URLs of the email is greater than a threshold amount, and wherein the email is routed to the addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the email and identified appropriate URLs of the email is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the routing includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the email to the addressee when the policy indicates that the email passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit = 51214-3 5h routing the email to the addressee when the policy indicates that the email fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to one aspect bf the present invention, there is provided a method for handling an electronic communication, said method comprising:
receiving the electronic communication; parsing the received electronic communication to identify URLs within the received electronic communication; for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each identified URL, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the identified URL and to maintain URL categories; rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of the identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and routing the electronic communication as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the electronic communication is not routed to an addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the electronic communication is routed to the addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the routing includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for controlling access by third parties to web pages of a website, said method comprising: parsing pages within a website; identifying URLs within the parsed web pages; categorizing the identified URLs by looking up the category of = 51214-3 5i each identified URL via a categorizing server system; rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and permitting a third party to access the web pages as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the third party is blocked from accessing the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the third party is permitted to access the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for handling an email, said method comprising: receiving the email for presentation to a client; parsing the received email to identify URLs within the parsed email; looking up a rating for each of the identified URLs via a categorizing server system; designating each identified URL as inappropriate or appropriate based on the rating of each identified URL; permitting the client to access the email when the percentage of designated inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of designated inappropriate URLs of the email and designated appropriate URLs of the email is below a threshold; and inhibiting the client to access the email when the percentage of designated inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of designated inappropriate URLs of the email and designated appropriate URLs of the email is at or above the threshold, wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the email to the client when the policy . 51214-3 5j indicates that the email passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the email to the client when the policy indicates that the email fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.

[0020] Other features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0021] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a client based system according to one embodiment of the invention for URL filtering of electronic communications.
[ 0022] FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a server based system according to the invention for URL filtering of electronic communications.
[ 0023] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a server based system according to one embodiment of the invention for URL filtering to clean up websites which are owned by a provider (such as group websites) by segregating, removing or blocking inappropriate URLs and/or web pages.
[ 0024 ] FIG. 4 is a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a method according to one embodiment of the invention for URL filtering of an electronic communication.
[ 0025 ] FIG. 5 is a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a method according to one embodiment of the invention for URL filtering to control access to pages or content within websites.
[0026] FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a method according to one embodiment of the invention for URL filtering to control email delivery.
[0027] FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating one example of a suitable computing system environment in which one embodiment of the invention may be implemented.
[0028] Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0029] Referring to Fig. 1, a system 100 handles an electronic communication 102 such as an email, an instant message or a chat room statement provided by a server 104 over a network. The system 100 is illustrated as implemented on a client's computer and controls whether an electronic communication which names the client as an addressee should be provided to the client. As indicated herein and as is known by those skilled in the art, the system 100 may also be implemented on a server (as shown in Fig. 2) or in any other configuration that allows it to evaluate the electronic communication 102 and control its routing.
[0030] As part of the software instructions operating the client computer 108, included are instructions for receiving the electronic communication 102.

Depending on the type of electronic communication, this may be an email application, an instant messaging program or a chat room program or any other application for receiving a electronic communication. A URL parser 110 breaks up each received electronic communication into smaller chunks to identify the URLs within the electronic communication. URL parsers are well known and are applied to the electronic communication to identify the URLs therein.
[0031] The software also includes instructions for categorizing the identified URLs. For example, the client computer 108 may include an on line lookup tool kit (OLTK) 112 for communicating with a category name service (CNS) server 114. The OLTK is an SDK that presents an application programming interface (API) that allows looking up one or more URLs and returns back category rating information for those URLs. The OLTK opens a socket to the CNS server and uses the HTTP protocol to transmit the URL(s) and receive the ratings. In one form, it is implemented as a .NET web service, so that it transmits and receives XML over HTTP.
[0032] The server 114 is connected to a URL database 116 which includes a list of URLs and a rating (such as an assigned number) or category for each URL in the database 116. In one embodiment, the assigned number is a rating value for a given category. For example, it may be an assigned number between 0 and 100 representing a confidence value or probability that the URL is a member of the inappropriate category in question. Further, there may be an assigned number for each supported category. For example, a URL that has a sexually oriented word within it might have ratings of PORN:100, ALCOHOL 0, MATURE CONTENT 75, VIOLENCE 0, etc.
[0033] In one embodiment, the URL parser 110 presents each URL found in the electronic communication to the tool kit 112, which passes the URLs to the server 114, which, in turn, looks up the category or rating in the database 116 and provides the category or rating information to the tool kit 112. In the event that the database does not have the URL listed or a category or rating for it, the server 114 will indicate that the URL is unrated. Alternatively, the CNS server 114 may attempt to rate the URL before responding or after responding, depending on the amount of time required to complete the rating.
[0034] The rating provided to each electronic communication depends on the purpose of the filtering. In one aspect relating to the control of content to minors, it is contemplated that each URL can have a zero or more category rating. For each application, a category might be considered appropriate or inappropriate. The CNS
server does not necessarily return a rating of appropriate or inappropriate.
It may assign a number to each identified URL based on its inappropriateness. The application decides which categories (or assigned number or total number) are inappropriate based on the information provided.. The extent to which a particular URL falls into one category or other depends on the rating criteria. For example, the percentage of inappropriate URLs may determine the handling of the electronic communication. If the percentage of inappropriate URLs meets or exceeds a threshold level (e.g., 50% or 10% or some other percentage), access to the electronic communication is limited to system administrators (e.g. parents) only and the electronic communication would be routed to the system administrator to a location where the administrator could access it but where client could not access it.
In other words, the electronic communication is not routed to an addressee when the percentage of inappropriate URLs relative to the total of inappropriate and appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than a threshold amount. It is also contemplated that the threshold amount may be a dynamic or weighted amount based on various factors and/or past experience. Also, the threshold may vary depend on the desires of the system administrator and it may be varied based on the profile of the client.
(0035] Another factor which may affect rating is subject matter. For example, the following categories of subject matter could be designated as unacceptable:
- on-line shopping - marketing - investing/real estate - investing/stocks - mortgage offers - sexual aids - impotence cures - pornography - gambling [0036] Additionally, the software includes instructions for routing the electronic communication as a function of the categorized URLs. For example, if all URLs of a particular electronic communication are inappropriate, access to the electronic communication is limited to system administrators and the electronic communication would be routed to the system administrator to a location where the administrator could access it but where client could not access it. As another example, if all URLs of a particular electronic communication are appropriate, access to the electronic communication is provided to the client or the electronic communication is routed to the client or to a location where the client can access the electronic communication.
[ 0037 ] Embodiments of the invention encompass other rating scenarios.
For example, each URL may have a numerical rating and whether an electronic communication is routed to a client or inhibited may depend on the numerical ratings.
For example, appropriate URLs may carry a zero rating and inappropriate URLs may carry a rating of 1 to 10. The total ratings of the URLs of an electronic communication would determine its handling. For example, if the total was greater than a threshold of 5, the electronic communication would not be available to the client.
[0038] In summary, the electronic communication is rated as a function of its identified URLs therein and the electronic communication is routed a function of the rating of the electronic communication. Electronic communications without URLs are considered appropriate and otherwise routed to the addressee.
[0039] The system includes a policy 118 including an allow/block logic.
The policy determines when to route the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic. The policy 118 also determines when to inhibit routing of an electronic communication to an addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic, onsxunwen=awmc*avArelcalSUR NWORNINIWROOPIMUILWARP101.4414M1 mow [0040] The following is an example of a policy for an application that filters email:
messages that do not contain URLs are routed to the end-user;
messages that come from a trusted source are routed to the end-user;
messages that contain ANY pornographic URLs are blocked for children;
messages that contain more than 10% pornographic URLs are blocked for adult users;
messages that contain more than 20% of URLs that belong to some other inappropriate category are blocked for all users;
etc.
[0041] In summary, a client system 100 as illustrated in Fig. 1 includes a client computer 108 having a memory M and having electronic communications capability for receiving electronic communications 102 from a source (server 104) for presentation to the client. The system 100 further includes instructions for receiving the electronic communications 102 from the server 104 and storing the received electronic communications102 in the memory M while initially inhibiting client access to the electronic communications. The system 100 further includes instructions for categorizing the electronic communications 102 stored in the memory M based on the URLs in the electronic communication. The system 100 further includes instructions for routing the electronic communication to the client and/or permitting client access to a particular electronic communication 102 as a function of the category of the electronic communication. In one embodiment, the instructions are stored on a computer readable medium and accessed by the client computer 108.
[ 0042 ] One embodiment of the invention may also be implemented by a server system 200 as illustrated in Fig. 2. System 200 includes a server computer 104 having a memory M and having communications capability for receiving electronic communications 102 from a source (such as a network; not shown) for presentation to the client 108. The system 200 further includes instructions for receiving electronic communications from the source and for categorizing the electronic communications based on the URLs therein. As noted above, the URL parser 110 parses the electronic communication for URLs, the URLs are categorized by OLTK 112 via CNS server 114 accessing URL database 1116, and the electronic communication is rated by policy 118 based on the categories of the URLs. The system 200 further includes instructions for selectively sending a particular electronic communication 102 to the client 108 as a function of the rating or category of the electronic communication. In one embodiment, the instructions are stored on a computer readable medium and accessed by the server 104.
[0043] Referring to Fig.4, operation of both the client system 100 and the server system 200 is illustrated. Specifically, both systems receive an electronic communication at 402. The electronic communication is parsed at 404. URLs within the parsed electronic communication are identified at 406. The policy is applied at 408. The electronic communication is routed to the client at 410 if the electronic communication passes the policy or is routed to a controlled area or deleted at 412 if the electronic communication fails the policy. For example, an email to a child may be routed to an adult whereas a chat message may be blocked (i.e., deleted).
[ 0044] The system and method according to one embodiment of the invention is also applicable to a web server which manages web pages of a website.
In this embodiment, the invention controls the content of the web pages and controls access to the pages when the content of the pages is created by third parties independent of the control of the web server. Referring to Fig. 3, a system 300 is illustrated for controlling access by third parties to web pages 302 under the control of a web server 304. This system 300 is particularly useful for managing a group website or a home page website. As described herein, one embodiment of the invention relates to the parsing and access control of web pages. Other embodiments includes parsing and control of part of or an entire website or controlling access to a website based on the parsing and rating of one or more pages of the website.
[0045] The system includes instructions 306 for parsing each web page 302. URLs within the parsed web page are identified and categorized, as noted above, by a OLTK 308, CNS server 310 and URL database 312. Third party users are permitted to access the web page as a function of the categorized URLs. As noted above with regard to electronic communications, each web page may be rated as a function of its identified URLs and third parties are permitted to access the web page as a function of the rating of the web page. Similarly, the rating may include rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate. For example, a third party is blocked from accessing the web page (or website, as noted above) when the rating of the page based on its URLs is considered inappropriate (e.g., higher than a threshold amount) or when the percentage of inappropriate URLs relative to the total of inappropriate and appropriate URLs of the web page (or website) is greater than a threshold amount. The threshold amount may be a dynamic or weighted amount based on various factors. For example, the threshold amount may be a numerical total or a percentage such as approximately 50% or more, at least 10% or another amount.
[0046] With specific reference to Figs. 3 and 5, the server side hardware system 300 comprises a server computer 304 presenting a plurality of web pages on a network 316 and having the capability of controlling access by third party users 314. The system 300 periodically parses each web page at 502 and identifies URLs within the web page at 504. The system 300 includes instructions for categorizing the web pages based on URLs therein by applying a policy at 506. The system 300 includes instructions 508 for permitting client access to a particular web page as a function of the categorization of the web page or for limiting access at 510.
In one embodiment, the instructions are in the form of an allow/block logic (policy) 318 and are stored on a computer readable medium and accessed by the server 304.
[ 0047 ] Fig. 6 illustrates a system 600 such as a client or server system for handling an email. Instructions 602 receive the email and instructions 604 parse the received email to extract the URLs. At 606, instructions determine whether the email contains URLs. If the parsing reveals that the email does not contain a URL, the email is delivered to the client/addressee at 608. If the email contains URLs, the URLs are identified and at 610 a rating for each of the identified URLs is looked up (e.g., by a OLTK and CNS server accessing a URL database). If all URLs are appropriate or clean, delivery of the message is allowed at 608 so that the client is permitted to access the email. When the number of inappropriate URLs is below a threshold. Delivery of the email is blocked at 616 and the client is inhibited from reading the email when the number of inappropriate URLs is at or above the threshold. In one embodiment, the instructions are stored on a computer readable medium and accessed by the client computer 108.
[ 004 8 ] FIG. 7 shows one example of a general purpose computing device in the form of a computer 130. In one embodiment of the invention, a computer such as the computer 130 is suitable for use in the other figures illustrated and described herein. Computer 130 has one or more processors or processing units 132 and a system memory 134. In the illustrated embodiment, a system bus 136 couples various system components including the system memory 134 to the processors 132. The bus 136 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus also known as Mezzanine bus.
[0049] The computer 130 typically has at least some form of computer readable media. Computer readable media, which include both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media, may be any available medium that can be accessed by computer 130. By way of example and not limitation, computer readable media comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. For example, computer storage media include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store the desired information and that can be accessed by computer 130. Communication media typically embody computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and include any information delivery media.
Those skilled in the art are familiar with the modulated data signal, which has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. Wired media, such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media, such as acoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media, are examples of communication media. Combinations of the any of the above are also included within the scope of computer readable media.
[ 0050 ] The system memory 134 includes computer storage media in the form of removable and/or non-removable, volatile and/or nonvolatile memory. In the illustrated embodiment, system memory 134 includes read only memory (ROM) 138 and random access memory (RAM) 140. A basic input/output system 142 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 130, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM 138.
RAM
140 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 132. By way of example, and not limitation, FIG. 7 illustrates operating system 144, application programs 146, other program modules 148, and program data 150.
[0051] The computer 130 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. For example, FIG. 7 illustrates a hard disk drive 154 that reads from or writes to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media. FIG. 7 also shows a magnetic disk drive 156 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile magnetic disk 158, and an optical disk drive 160 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk 162 such as a CD-ROM or other optical media. Other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media that can be used in the exemplary operating environment include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solid state ROM, and the like. The hard disk drive 154, and magnetic disk drive 156 and optical disk drive 160 are typically connected to the system bus 136 by a non-volatile memory interface, such as interface 166.
[0052] The drives or other mass storage devices and their associated computer storage media discussed above and illustrated in FIG. 7, provide storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computer 130. In FIG. 7, for example, hard disk drive 154 is illustrated as storing operating system 170, application programs 172, other program modules 174, and program data 176. Note that these components can either be the same as or different from operating system 144, application programs 146, other program modules 148, and program data 150. Operating system 170, application programs 172, other program modules 174, and program data 176 are given different numbers here to illustrate that, at a minimum, they are different copies.
[ 0053] A user may enter commands and information into computer 130 through input devices or user interface selection devices such as a keyboard 180 and a pointing device 182 (e.g., a mouse, trackball, pen, or touch pad). Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are connected to processing unit 132 through a user input interface 184 that is coupled to system bus 136, but may be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port, or a Universal Serial Bus (USB). A monitor 188 or other type of display device is also connected to system bus 136 via an interface, such as a video interface 190. In addition to the monitor 188, computers often include other peripheral output devices (not shown) such as a printer and speakers, which may be connected through an output peripheral interface (not shown).
[ 0054 ] The computer 130 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 194.
The remote computer 194 may be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to computer 130. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 7 include a local area network (LAN) 196 and a wide area network (WAN) 198, but may also include other networks. LAN 136 and/or WAN 138 can be a wired network, a wireless network, a combination thereof, and so on. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and global computer networks (e.g., the Internet).
[ 0055] When used in a local area networking environment, computer 130 is connected to the LAN 196 through a network interface or adapter 186. When used in a wide area networking environment, computer 130 typically includes a modem 178 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 198, such as the Internet. The modem 178, which may be internal or external, is connected to system bus 136 via the user input interface 184, or other appropriate mechanism. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to computer 130, or portions thereof, may be stored in a remote memory storage device (not shown).
By way of example, and not limitation, FIG. 7 illustrates remote application programs 192 as residing on the memory device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
[0056] Generally, the data processors of computer 130 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer. Programs and operating systems are typically distributed, for example, on floppy disks or CD-ROMs. From there, they are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, they are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory. The invention described herein includes these and other various types of computer-readable storage media when such media contain instructions or programs for implementing the steps described below in conjunction with a microprocessor or other data processor.
The invention also includes the computer itself when programmed according to the methods and techniques described herein.
[ 0057] For purposes of illustration, programs and other executable program components, such as the operating system, are illustrated herein as discrete blocks. It is recognized, however, that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.
[ 0058] Although described in connection with an exemplary computing system environment, including computer 130, the invention is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. The computing system environment is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of the invention. Moreover, the computing system environment should not be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, mobile telephones, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
[0059] The invention may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include, but are not limited to, routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
- _______________________________________ [0060] In operation, computer 130 executes computer-executable instructions such as those illustrated in FIGs. 1-6 including, for example, parsing, identifying, categorizing, routing, permitting third parties to access, looking up a rating, designating, permitting the client to access, inhibiting the client to access, receiving electronic communications, storing the received electronic communications, categorizing the stored electronic communications, permitting client access, selectively sending a particular electronic communication, periodically categorizing, as noted herein.
[ 0 61] Those skilled in the art will note that the order of execution or performance of the methods illustrated and described herein is not essential, unless otherwise specified. That is, it is contemplated by the inventors that elements of the methods may be performed in any order, unless otherwise specified, and that the methods may include more or less elements than those disclosed herein.
[ 0 062] When introducing elements of the present invention or the embodiment(s) thereof, the articles "a," "an," "the," and "said" are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms "comprising,"
"including," and "having" are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
[0063] In view of the above, it will be seen that the several objects of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results attained.
[0064] As various changes could be made in the above constructions, products, and methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

Claims (51)

CLAIMS:
1. A system for handling an electronic communication, said system comprising:
a computer processor and;
a computer readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, that when executed by the computer processor, perform a method comprising:
receiving the electronic communication;
parsing the received electronic communication to identify URLs within the received electronic communication;
for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each identified URL, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the identified URL
and to maintain URL categories;
rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of the identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and routing the electronic communication as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the electronic communication is not routed to an addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the electronic communication is routed to the addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the routing includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the received electronic communication comprises one or more electronic emails selected from the group comprising: an email, an instant message or a chat room statement.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the threshold amount is a dynamic or weighted amount based on various factors.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the threshold amount is at least 50%.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the threshold amount is at least 10%.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein the threshold amount is greater than zero.
7. The system of claim 1 wherein the sending comprises connecting to an on-line look up service to determine the category of each identified URL.
8. The system of claim 1 wherein the identifying includes using an on line look-up tool kit.
9. A system for controlling access by third parties to web pages of a website, said system comprising:
a computer processor;

a computer readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, that when executed by the computer processor, perform a method comprising:
parsing pages within a website;
identifying URLs within the parsed web pages;
categorizing the identified URLs by looking up the category of each identified URL via a categorizing server system;
rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and permitting a third party to access the web pages as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the third party is blocked from accessing the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the third party is permitted to access the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
10. The system of claim 9 wherein the parsed page comprises one or more pages selected from the group comprising: one or more web pages of a group website, and one or more home pages.
11. The system of claim 9 wherein the threshold amount is a dynamic or weighted amount based on various factors.
12. The system of claim 9 wherein the threshold amount is at least 50%.
13. The system of claim 9 wherein the threshold amount is at least 10%.
14. The system of claim 9 wherein the threshold amount is greater than zero.
15. The system of claim 9 wherein looking up comprises connecting to an on-line look up service to determine the category of each identified URL.
16. The system of claim 15 wherein the connecting comprises accessing a category name service server employing a URL database to cross reference the URL
and maintain URL categories.
17. The system of claim 9 wherein the identifying includes using an on-line look-up tool kit.
18. A system for handling an email, said system comprising:
a computer processor;
a computer readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon, that when executed by the computer processor, perform a method comprising:
receiving the email for presentation to a client;
parsing the received email to identify URLs within the parsed email;

looking up a rating for each of the identified URLs via a categorizing server system;
designating each identified URL as inappropriate or appropriate based on the rating of each identified URL;
permitting the client to access the email when the percentage of designated inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of designated inappropriate URLs of the email and designated appropriate URLs of the email is below a threshold; and inhibiting the client to access the email when the percentage of designated inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of designated inappropriate URLs of the email and designated appropriate URLs of the email is at or above the threshold, wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the email to the client when the policy indicates that the email passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the email to the client when the policy indicates that the email fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
19. The system of claim 18 wherein a client is permitted to access the email if the email does not contain any URLs.
20. The system of claim 18 wherein the looking up includes using an on-line look-up tool kit.
21. A client side hardware system comprising:
a client computer having a memory and having capability for receiving electronic communications from a source for presentation to a client;

instructions for receiving an electronic communication from the source and storing the received electronic communication in the memory while initially inhibiting client access to the electronic communication;
instructions for categorizing the stored electronic communication based on the URLs therein by looking up the category of each identified URL via a categorizing server system, said categorizing server system employing a URL
database to cross reference the URL and to maintain URL categories;
instructions for rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of the identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and instructions for routing the electronic communication as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the client is not permitted access to the electronic communication if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the client is permitted access to the electronic communication if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the instructions for permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the email fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
22. The system of claim 21 wherein the received electronic communication comprises one or more electronic emails selected from the group comprising: an email, an instant message or a chat room statement.
23. The system of claim 21 wherein the instructions for categorizing include using an on-line look-up tool kit.
24. A server side hardware system comprising:
a server computer having a memory and having capability for receiving electronic communications from a source for presentation to a client, said electronic communication comprises one or more of the following: an email, an instant message or a chat room statement, said server being configured with executable instructions for:
defining a threshold value;
receiving an electronic communication from a source and storing the received electronic communication in the memory;
parsing the received electronic communication to identify URLs within the parsed electronic communication;
for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each identified URL, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL and to maintain URL categories;
rating the stored electronic communication as appropriate or inappropriate based on the assigned category of the each identified URL; and selectively sending the electronic communication to the client as a function of the rating of the electronic communication, wherein the electronic communication is not routed to the client if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than the threshold value, and wherein the electronic communication is routed to the client if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is less than or equal to the threshold value, and wherein the instructions for routing include a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determine to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
25. The system of claim 24 wherein the instructions for categorizing include using an on-line look-up tool kit.
26. A server side hardware system comprising:
a server computer presenting a plurality of websites having web pages on a network and having the capability of controlling a client's access to the web pages of the websites;
instructions for periodically rating a web page based on categories of the URLs therein, said categories of the URLs identified by a categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL and maintain URL
categories;
instructions for rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of identified category corresponding to each identified URL;
instructions for routing the web page to the client as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the client is not permitted access to the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the client is permitted access to the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the instructions for permitting include a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the web page to the client when the policy indicates that the web page passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determine to inhibit routing the web page to the client when the policy indicates that the web page fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
27. The system of claim 26 wherein the parsed page comprises one or more pages selected from the group comprising: one or more web pages of a group website, and one or more home pages.
28. The system of claim 26 wherein the instructions for categorizing include using an on-line look-up tool kit.
29. A computer readable storage medium for handling an electronic communication, said medium including instructions stored thereon, when executed by a computer processor, to perform a method of:
receiving the electronic communication for presentation to a client;
parsing the received electronic communication to identify URLs within the parsed electronic communication;
for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each of the identified URLs by looking up the category of each identified URL via a categorizing server system, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL

and maintain URL categories;
designating each identified URL as inappropriate or appropriate based on its category;
permitting the client to access the electronic communication when the percentage of inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is below a threshold; and inhibiting the client to access the electronic communication when the percentage of inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is at or above the threshold, and wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determine to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the client when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
30. A computer readable storage medium for controlling access by third parties to web pages of a website, said medium including instructions stored thereon, when executed by a computer processor, to perform a method of:
parsing web pages within a website to identify URLs within the parsed web pages;
for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category of the identified URLs, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL and maintain URL
categories;
rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and permitting a third party to access the web pages as a function of the rating of the URLs, wherein the third party is blocked from accessing the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the third party is permitted to access the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
31. A computer readable storage medium for handling an email, said medium including instructions stored thereon, when executed by a computer processor, to perform a method of:
receiving the email;
parsing the received email;
identifying URLs within the parsed email;
for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each identified URL, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the URL and maintain URL categories;
rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate based on the identified categories of the identified URLs; and routing the email as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the email is not routed to an addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the email and identified appropriate URLs of the email is greater than a threshold amount, and wherein the email is routed to the addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the email and identified appropriate URLs of the email is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the routing includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the email to the addressee when the policy indicates that the email passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the email to the addressee when the policy indicates that the email fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
32. A method for handling an electronic communication, said method comprising:
receiving the electronic communication;
parsing the received electronic communication to identify URLs within the received electronic communication;
for each identified URL, sending a request to a categorizing server system to identify the category assigned to each identified URL, said categorizing server system employing a URL database to cross reference the identified URL
and to maintain URL categories;
rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of the identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and routing the electronic communication as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the electronic communication is not routed to an addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the electronic communication is routed to the addressee if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the electronic communication and identified appropriate URLs of the electronic communication is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the routing includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the electronic communication to the addressee when the policy indicates that the electronic communication fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
33. The method of claim 32 wherein the received electronic communication comprises one or more electronic emails selected from the group comprising: an email, an instant message or a chat room statement.
34. The method of claim 32 wherein the threshold amount is a dynamic or weighted amount based on various factors.
35. The method of claim 32 wherein the threshold amount is at least 50%.
36. The method of claim 32 wherein the threshold amount is at least 10%.
37. The method of claim 32 wherein the threshold amount is greater than zero.
38. The method of claim 32 wherein the sending comprises connecting to an on-line look up service to determine the category of each identified URL.
39. The method of claim 32 wherein the identifying includes using an on line look-up tool kit.
40. A method for controlling access by third parties to web pages of a website, said method comprising:
parsing pages within a website;
identifying URLs within the parsed web pages;
categorizing the identified URLs by looking up the category of each identified URL via a categorizing server system;
rating each identified URL as appropriate or inappropriate as a function of identified category corresponding to each identified URL; and permitting a third party to access the web pages as a function of the rating of each identified URL, wherein the third party is blocked from accessing the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is greater than a threshold amount, wherein the third party is permitted to access the web page if the percentage of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page relative to the total of identified inappropriate URLs of the web page and identified appropriate URLs of the web page is less than or equal to the threshold amount, and wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the web page to the third party when the policy indicates that the web page fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
41. The method of claim 40 wherein the parsed page comprises one or more pages selected from the group comprising: one or more web pages of a group website, and one or more home pages.
42. The method of claim 40 wherein the threshold amount is a dynamic or weighted amount based on various factors.
43. The method of claim 40 wherein the threshold amount is at least 50%.
44. The method of claim 40 wherein the threshold amount is at least 10%.
45. The method of claim 40 wherein the threshold amount is greater than zero.
46. The method of claim 40 wherein looking up comprises connecting to an on-line look up service to determine the category of each identified URL.
47. The method of claim 46 wherein the connecting comprises accessing a category name service server employing a URL database to cross reference the URL
and maintain URL categories.
48. The method of claim 40 wherein the identifying includes using an on-line look-up tool kit.
49. A method for handling an email, said method comprising:
receiving the email for presentation to a client;
parsing the received email to identify URLs within the parsed email;
looking up a rating for each of the identified URLs via a categorizing server system;
designating each identified URL as inappropriate or appropriate based on the rating of each identified URL;
permitting the client to access the email when the percentage of designated inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of designated inappropriate URLs of the email and designated appropriate URLs of the email is below a threshold; and inhibiting the client to access the email when the percentage of designated inappropriate URLs of the email relative to the total of designated inappropriate URLs of the email and designated appropriate URLs of the email is at or above the threshold, wherein the permitting includes a policy including an allow/block logic which determines to route the email to the client when the policy indicates that the email passes the allow logic and fails the block logic and which determines to inhibit routing the email to the client when the policy indicates that the email fails the allow logic and passes the block logic.
50. The method of claim 49 wherein a client is permitted to access the email if the email does not contain any URLs.
51. The method of claim 49 wherein the looking up includes using an on-line look-up tool kit.
CA2475323A 2003-08-25 2004-07-20 Url based filtering of electronic communications and web pages Expired - Fee Related CA2475323C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/647,824 US7421498B2 (en) 2003-08-25 2003-08-25 Method and system for URL based filtering of electronic communications and web pages
US10/647,824 2003-08-25

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2475323A1 CA2475323A1 (en) 2005-02-25
CA2475323C true CA2475323C (en) 2013-11-26

Family

ID=34104653

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA2475323A Expired - Fee Related CA2475323C (en) 2003-08-25 2004-07-20 Url based filtering of electronic communications and web pages

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US7421498B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1510945A1 (en)
JP (1) JP4847691B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101203331B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1592229B (en)
BR (1) BRPI0403149A (en)
CA (1) CA2475323C (en)
MX (1) MXPA04007144A (en)

Families Citing this family (170)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8352400B2 (en) 1991-12-23 2013-01-08 Hoffberg Steven M Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore
US7904187B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2011-03-08 Hoffberg Steven M Internet appliance system and method
US7174453B2 (en) 2000-12-29 2007-02-06 America Online, Inc. Message screening system
JP4386732B2 (en) 2002-01-08 2009-12-16 セブン ネットワークス, インコーポレイテッド Mobile network connection architecture
US7743045B2 (en) * 2005-08-10 2010-06-22 Google Inc. Detecting spam related and biased contexts for programmable search engines
US7716199B2 (en) 2005-08-10 2010-05-11 Google Inc. Aggregating context data for programmable search engines
US7693830B2 (en) * 2005-08-10 2010-04-06 Google Inc. Programmable search engine
WO2004055632A2 (en) 2002-12-13 2004-07-01 Wholesecurity, Inc. Method, system, and computer program product for security within a global computer network
US7640336B1 (en) 2002-12-30 2009-12-29 Aol Llc Supervising user interaction with online services
US7917468B2 (en) 2005-08-01 2011-03-29 Seven Networks, Inc. Linking of personal information management data
US8145710B2 (en) 2003-06-18 2012-03-27 Symantec Corporation System and method for filtering spam messages utilizing URL filtering module
US8271588B1 (en) * 2003-09-24 2012-09-18 Symantec Corporation System and method for filtering fraudulent email messages
US7536442B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2009-05-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and storage medium for providing autonomic identification of an important message
US7219299B2 (en) 2003-11-19 2007-05-15 Microsoft Corporation Method for blocking dereferencing elements in messages
US7444403B1 (en) * 2003-11-25 2008-10-28 Microsoft Corporation Detecting sexually predatory content in an electronic communication
US7941490B1 (en) 2004-05-11 2011-05-10 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting spam in email messages and email attachments
US7565445B2 (en) 2004-06-18 2009-07-21 Fortinet, Inc. Systems and methods for categorizing network traffic content
US7552186B2 (en) * 2004-06-28 2009-06-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for filtering spam using an adjustable reliability value
US9792633B2 (en) * 2004-06-29 2017-10-17 Blake Bookstaff Method and system for intelligent processing of electronic information with cloud computing
GB2416879B (en) 2004-08-07 2007-04-04 Surfcontrol Plc Device resource access filtering system and method
GB2418037B (en) 2004-09-09 2007-02-28 Surfcontrol Plc System, method and apparatus for use in monitoring or controlling internet access
GB2418999A (en) 2004-09-09 2006-04-12 Surfcontrol Plc Categorizing uniform resource locators
GB2418108B (en) 2004-09-09 2007-06-27 Surfcontrol Plc System, method and apparatus for use in monitoring or controlling internet access
WO2006036987A2 (en) * 2004-09-24 2006-04-06 American Girl, Llc Online loyality program
US20060122957A1 (en) * 2004-12-03 2006-06-08 Johnny Chen Method and system to detect e-mail spam using concept categorization of linked content
JP2006268303A (en) * 2005-03-23 2006-10-05 Nomura Research Institute Ltd Contributed data evaluation system
JP2006268304A (en) * 2005-03-23 2006-10-05 Nomura Research Institute Ltd Contributed data evaluation device
US9288078B2 (en) 2005-03-25 2016-03-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and methods for managing content exchange on a wireless device
US7603413B1 (en) * 2005-04-07 2009-10-13 Aol Llc Using automated agents to facilitate chat communications
US8438633B1 (en) 2005-04-21 2013-05-07 Seven Networks, Inc. Flexible real-time inbox access
US7739337B1 (en) 2005-06-20 2010-06-15 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for grouping spam email messages
US8010609B2 (en) * 2005-06-20 2011-08-30 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for maintaining reputation lists of IP addresses to detect email spam
WO2006136660A1 (en) 2005-06-21 2006-12-28 Seven Networks International Oy Maintaining an ip connection in a mobile network
GB0512744D0 (en) 2005-06-22 2005-07-27 Blackspider Technologies Method and system for filtering electronic messages
US7822818B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2010-10-26 Symantec Corporation Methods and systems for detecting and preventing the spread of malware on instant messaging (IM) networks by using automated IM users
US7577993B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2009-08-18 Symantec Corporation Methods and systems for detecting and preventing the spread of malware on instant messaging (IM) networks by using Bayesian filtering
US7823200B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2010-10-26 Symantec Corporation Methods and systems for detecting and preventing the spread of malware on instant messaging (IM) networks by analyzing message traffic patterns
US7600258B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2009-10-06 Symantec Corporation Methods and systems for detecting and preventing the spread of malware on instant messaging (IM) networks by using fictitious buddies
US7908329B2 (en) * 2005-08-16 2011-03-15 Microsoft Corporation Enhanced e-mail folder security
US7912907B1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2011-03-22 Symantec Corporation Spam email detection based on n-grams with feature selection
US20070083673A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Speedus Corp. Hypertext content filter
US20070143469A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Greenview Data, Inc. Method for identifying and filtering unsolicited bulk email
US7769395B2 (en) * 2006-06-20 2010-08-03 Seven Networks, Inc. Location-based operations and messaging
US7809796B1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2010-10-05 Ironport Systems, Inc. Method of controlling access to network resources using information in electronic mail messages
US20070271220A1 (en) * 2006-05-19 2007-11-22 Chbag, Inc. System, method and apparatus for filtering web content
US20080082662A1 (en) 2006-05-19 2008-04-03 Richard Dandliker Method and apparatus for controlling access to network resources based on reputation
US7668921B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2010-02-23 Xerox Corporation Method and system for phishing detection
US20080001717A1 (en) * 2006-06-20 2008-01-03 Trevor Fiatal System and method for group management
US8615800B2 (en) * 2006-07-10 2013-12-24 Websense, Inc. System and method for analyzing web content
US8020206B2 (en) 2006-07-10 2011-09-13 Websense, Inc. System and method of analyzing web content
CN101166159B (en) 2006-10-18 2010-07-28 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 A method and system for identifying rubbish information
US9654495B2 (en) * 2006-12-01 2017-05-16 Websense, Llc System and method of analyzing web addresses
US20080162448A1 (en) * 2006-12-28 2008-07-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method for tracking syntactic properties of a url
GB2458094A (en) * 2007-01-09 2009-09-09 Surfcontrol On Demand Ltd URL interception and categorization in firewalls
GB2445764A (en) 2007-01-22 2008-07-23 Surfcontrol Plc Resource access filtering system and database structure for use therewith
EP2127311B1 (en) 2007-02-02 2013-10-09 Websense, Inc. System and method for adding context to prevent data leakage over a computer network
US8560630B2 (en) * 2007-02-28 2013-10-15 Microsoft Corporation Sharing data over trusted networks
US8015174B2 (en) 2007-02-28 2011-09-06 Websense, Inc. System and method of controlling access to the internet
US20080215678A1 (en) * 2007-03-01 2008-09-04 Coletrane Candice L Bookmarking URLs From An Instant Messaging Session
JP2008250597A (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-16 Kddi Corp Computer system
US7756987B2 (en) * 2007-04-04 2010-07-13 Microsoft Corporation Cybersquatter patrol
US8141133B2 (en) * 2007-04-11 2012-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Filtering communications between users of a shared network
US9246938B2 (en) 2007-04-23 2016-01-26 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for detecting malicious mobile program code
GB0709574D0 (en) * 2007-05-18 2007-06-27 Aurix Ltd Speech Screening
GB0709527D0 (en) * 2007-05-18 2007-06-27 Surfcontrol Plc Electronic messaging system, message processing apparatus and message processing method
US7873635B2 (en) * 2007-05-31 2011-01-18 Microsoft Corporation Search ranger system and double-funnel model for search spam analyses and browser protection
US9430577B2 (en) * 2007-05-31 2016-08-30 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Search ranger system and double-funnel model for search spam analyses and browser protection
US8667117B2 (en) * 2007-05-31 2014-03-04 Microsoft Corporation Search ranger system and double-funnel model for search spam analyses and browser protection
US8805425B2 (en) 2007-06-01 2014-08-12 Seven Networks, Inc. Integrated messaging
US7870609B2 (en) * 2007-06-29 2011-01-11 Microsoft Corporation Detection and removal of undesirable items in a data processing environment
US20160012454A1 (en) * 2007-08-16 2016-01-14 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Database systems for measuring impact on the internet
US8195634B2 (en) * 2007-09-28 2012-06-05 Microsoft Corporation Domain-aware snippets for search results
US8074162B1 (en) * 2007-10-23 2011-12-06 Google Inc. Method and system for verifying the appropriateness of shared content
US9122751B2 (en) * 2007-12-07 2015-09-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method of tagging instant messaging (IM) conversations for easy information sharing
US8364181B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2013-01-29 Seven Networks, Inc. Electronic-mail filtering for mobile devices
US9002828B2 (en) 2007-12-13 2015-04-07 Seven Networks, Inc. Predictive content delivery
US8346953B1 (en) 2007-12-18 2013-01-01 AOL, Inc. Methods and systems for restricting electronic content access based on guardian control decisions
US8949977B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2015-02-03 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Look ahead of links/alter links
US8495486B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2013-07-23 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Look ahead of links/alter links
US8443106B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2013-05-14 Gary Stephen Shuster Content restriction compliance using reverse DNS lookup
US8468440B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2013-06-18 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Look ahead of links/alter links
US8793616B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2014-07-29 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Look ahead of links/alter links
US20090165134A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Look ahead of links/alter links
US8489981B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2013-07-16 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Look ahead of links/alter links
US8473836B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2013-06-25 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Look ahead of links/alter links
US8862657B2 (en) 2008-01-25 2014-10-14 Seven Networks, Inc. Policy based content service
US20090193338A1 (en) 2008-01-28 2009-07-30 Trevor Fiatal Reducing network and battery consumption during content delivery and playback
US7908658B1 (en) * 2008-03-17 2011-03-15 Trend Micro Incorporated System using IM screener in a client computer to monitor bad reputation web sites in outgoing messages to prevent propagation of IM attacks
US8370948B2 (en) 2008-03-19 2013-02-05 Websense, Inc. System and method for analysis of electronic information dissemination events
US8407784B2 (en) 2008-03-19 2013-03-26 Websense, Inc. Method and system for protection against information stealing software
US9015842B2 (en) 2008-03-19 2015-04-21 Websense, Inc. Method and system for protection against information stealing software
US9130986B2 (en) 2008-03-19 2015-09-08 Websense, Inc. Method and system for protection against information stealing software
US8787947B2 (en) 2008-06-18 2014-07-22 Seven Networks, Inc. Application discovery on mobile devices
US8078158B2 (en) 2008-06-26 2011-12-13 Seven Networks, Inc. Provisioning applications for a mobile device
EP2318955A1 (en) * 2008-06-30 2011-05-11 Websense, Inc. System and method for dynamic and real-time categorization of webpages
US20100031365A1 (en) * 2008-07-31 2010-02-04 Balachander Krishnamurthy Method and apparatus for providing network access privacy
JP5090305B2 (en) * 2008-09-26 2012-12-05 ヤフー株式会社 Junk mail processing method, system, apparatus and program
US8909759B2 (en) 2008-10-10 2014-12-09 Seven Networks, Inc. Bandwidth measurement
US9154942B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2015-10-06 Free Stream Media Corp. Zero configuration communication between a browser and a networked media device
US8285830B1 (en) * 2009-01-06 2012-10-09 Citizenhawk, Inc. System and method for combating cybersquatting
US8631080B2 (en) * 2009-03-12 2014-01-14 Microsoft Corporation Email characterization
US8255685B2 (en) * 2009-03-17 2012-08-28 Research In Motion Limited System and method for validating certificate issuance notification messages
US8281361B1 (en) * 2009-03-26 2012-10-02 Symantec Corporation Methods and systems for enforcing parental-control policies on user-generated content
US9130972B2 (en) 2009-05-26 2015-09-08 Websense, Inc. Systems and methods for efficient detection of fingerprinted data and information
US8903941B1 (en) * 2009-09-14 2014-12-02 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for safe web browsing
GB2488274A (en) * 2009-12-11 2012-08-22 Neuralitic Systems A method and system for efficient and exhaustive url categorization
US8479286B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2013-07-02 Mcafee, Inc. Systems and methods for behavioral sandboxing
WO2011079416A1 (en) * 2009-12-30 2011-07-07 Google Inc. Category-sensitive ranking for text
US8443452B2 (en) * 2010-01-28 2013-05-14 Microsoft Corporation URL filtering based on user browser history
US8813232B2 (en) 2010-03-04 2014-08-19 Mcafee Inc. Systems and methods for risk rating and pro-actively detecting malicious online ads
US8510829B2 (en) * 2010-06-24 2013-08-13 Mcafee, Inc. Systems and methods to detect malicious media files
US9043433B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2015-05-26 Seven Networks, Inc. Mobile network traffic coordination across multiple applications
US8838783B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2014-09-16 Seven Networks, Inc. Distributed caching for resource and mobile network traffic management
CN101917443A (en) * 2010-08-26 2010-12-15 北京天融信科技有限公司 Security gateway and method thereof for controlling sensitive link
US8843153B2 (en) 2010-11-01 2014-09-23 Seven Networks, Inc. Mobile traffic categorization and policy for network use optimization while preserving user experience
US8484314B2 (en) 2010-11-01 2013-07-09 Seven Networks, Inc. Distributed caching in a wireless network of content delivered for a mobile application over a long-held request
WO2012060995A2 (en) 2010-11-01 2012-05-10 Michael Luna Distributed caching in a wireless network of content delivered for a mobile application over a long-held request
GB2500327B (en) 2010-11-22 2019-11-06 Seven Networks Llc Optimization of resource polling intervals to satisfy mobile device requests
CN102110132B (en) * 2010-12-08 2013-06-19 北京星网锐捷网络技术有限公司 Uniform resource locator matching and searching method, device and network equipment
FR2969887B1 (en) * 2010-12-28 2013-01-04 Olfeo DATA PROCESSING METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ACCESS TO CONTENTS ON THE INTERNET.
US9325662B2 (en) 2011-01-07 2016-04-26 Seven Networks, Llc System and method for reduction of mobile network traffic used for domain name system (DNS) queries
CN102073722A (en) * 2011-01-11 2011-05-25 吕晓东 URL (Uniform Resource Locator) cloud publishing system
WO2012145541A2 (en) 2011-04-19 2012-10-26 Seven Networks, Inc. Social caching for device resource sharing and management
CA2797631C (en) 2011-04-27 2013-11-19 Seven Networks, Inc. System and method for making requests on behalf of a mobile device based on atomic processes for mobile network traffic relief
GB2505585B (en) 2011-04-27 2015-08-12 Seven Networks Inc Detecting and preserving state for satisfying application requests in a distributed proxy and cache system
US9117074B2 (en) 2011-05-18 2015-08-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Detecting a compromised online user account
US9087324B2 (en) 2011-07-12 2015-07-21 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Message categorization
US8984581B2 (en) 2011-07-27 2015-03-17 Seven Networks, Inc. Monitoring mobile application activities for malicious traffic on a mobile device
US20130031191A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-31 Ross Bott Mobile device usage control in a mobile network by a distributed proxy system
US9065826B2 (en) 2011-08-08 2015-06-23 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Identifying application reputation based on resource accesses
CN102955810B (en) * 2011-08-26 2015-12-02 中国移动通信集团公司 A kind of Web page classification method and equipment
US9223888B2 (en) * 2011-09-08 2015-12-29 Bryce Hutchings Combining client and server classifiers to achieve better accuracy and performance results in web page classification
TW201312369A (en) * 2011-09-13 2013-03-16 Univ Nat Central Method for filetring web page content and network equipment
US9323859B2 (en) * 2011-09-30 2016-04-26 Verisign, Inc. Dynamic client side name suggestion service
US8868753B2 (en) 2011-12-06 2014-10-21 Seven Networks, Inc. System of redundantly clustered machines to provide failover mechanisms for mobile traffic management and network resource conservation
US8934414B2 (en) 2011-12-06 2015-01-13 Seven Networks, Inc. Cellular or WiFi mobile traffic optimization based on public or private network destination
US9009250B2 (en) 2011-12-07 2015-04-14 Seven Networks, Inc. Flexible and dynamic integration schemas of a traffic management system with various network operators for network traffic alleviation
WO2013086447A1 (en) 2011-12-07 2013-06-13 Seven Networks, Inc. Radio-awareness of mobile device for sending server-side control signals using a wireless network optimized transport protocol
US20130159511A1 (en) 2011-12-14 2013-06-20 Seven Networks, Inc. System and method for generating a report to a network operator by distributing aggregation of data
CN102567534B (en) * 2011-12-31 2014-02-19 凤凰在线(北京)信息技术有限公司 Interactive product user generated content intercepting system and intercepting method for the same
WO2013103988A1 (en) 2012-01-05 2013-07-11 Seven Networks, Inc. Detection and management of user interactions with foreground applications on a mobile device in distributed caching
US9203864B2 (en) 2012-02-02 2015-12-01 Seven Networks, Llc Dynamic categorization of applications for network access in a mobile network
WO2013116852A1 (en) 2012-02-03 2013-08-08 Seven Networks, Inc. User as an end point for profiling and optimizing the delivery of content and data in a wireless network
US8812695B2 (en) 2012-04-09 2014-08-19 Seven Networks, Inc. Method and system for management of a virtual network connection without heartbeat messages
US20130268656A1 (en) 2012-04-10 2013-10-10 Seven Networks, Inc. Intelligent customer service/call center services enhanced using real-time and historical mobile application and traffic-related statistics collected by a distributed caching system in a mobile network
US8775631B2 (en) 2012-07-13 2014-07-08 Seven Networks, Inc. Dynamic bandwidth adjustment for browsing or streaming activity in a wireless network based on prediction of user behavior when interacting with mobile applications
CN102932400B (en) * 2012-07-20 2015-06-17 北京网康科技有限公司 Method and device for identifying uniform resource locator primary links
GB2506381B (en) 2012-09-27 2016-06-08 F Secure Corp Automated detection of harmful content
US9161258B2 (en) 2012-10-24 2015-10-13 Seven Networks, Llc Optimized and selective management of policy deployment to mobile clients in a congested network to prevent further aggravation of network congestion
US9241259B2 (en) 2012-11-30 2016-01-19 Websense, Inc. Method and apparatus for managing the transfer of sensitive information to mobile devices
US9307493B2 (en) 2012-12-20 2016-04-05 Seven Networks, Llc Systems and methods for application management of mobile device radio state promotion and demotion
US9467410B2 (en) * 2012-12-20 2016-10-11 Mcafee, Inc. Just-in-time, email embedded URL reputation determination
US9117054B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2015-08-25 Websense, Inc. Method and aparatus for presence based resource management
US9271238B2 (en) 2013-01-23 2016-02-23 Seven Networks, Llc Application or context aware fast dormancy
US8874761B2 (en) 2013-01-25 2014-10-28 Seven Networks, Inc. Signaling optimization in a wireless network for traffic utilizing proprietary and non-proprietary protocols
US8750123B1 (en) 2013-03-11 2014-06-10 Seven Networks, Inc. Mobile device equipped with mobile network congestion recognition to make intelligent decisions regarding connecting to an operator network
US9065765B2 (en) 2013-07-22 2015-06-23 Seven Networks, Inc. Proxy server associated with a mobile carrier for enhancing mobile traffic management in a mobile network
KR102131943B1 (en) 2013-09-11 2020-07-08 삼성전자주식회사 Method for controlling an url and an electronic device
US9690760B2 (en) 2014-05-15 2017-06-27 International Business Machines Corporation Bidirectional hyperlink synchronization for managing hypertexts in social media and public data repository
US10003602B2 (en) 2014-06-24 2018-06-19 International Business Machines Corporation Determining email authenticity
US9160680B1 (en) 2014-11-18 2015-10-13 Kaspersky Lab Zao System and method for dynamic network resource categorization re-assignment
US9674129B1 (en) 2016-10-05 2017-06-06 eTorch Inc. Email privacy enforcement
US9824332B1 (en) 2017-04-12 2017-11-21 eTorch Inc. Email data collection compliance enforcement
US9559997B1 (en) 2016-01-11 2017-01-31 Paul Everton Client agnostic email processing
US20180084002A1 (en) * 2016-09-20 2018-03-22 Re-Sec Technologies Ltd. Malicious hyperlink protection
US10721212B2 (en) * 2016-12-19 2020-07-21 General Electric Company Network policy update with operational technology
US10454952B2 (en) 2016-12-23 2019-10-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Threat protection in documents
US10334015B2 (en) * 2017-04-28 2019-06-25 Bank Of America Corporation Apparatus and methods for shortening user exposure to malicious websites
US10462187B2 (en) * 2017-08-28 2019-10-29 General Electric Company Network security policy configuration based on predetermined command groups
JP6614321B2 (en) * 2018-12-28 2019-12-04 キヤノンマーケティングジャパン株式会社 Information processing system, access relay device, control method thereof, and program

Family Cites Families (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5724567A (en) * 1994-04-25 1998-03-03 Apple Computer, Inc. System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users
CA2176775C (en) * 1995-06-06 1999-08-03 Brenda Sue Baker System and method for database access administration
US5706507A (en) * 1995-07-05 1998-01-06 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for controlling access to data located on a content server
US6453327B1 (en) * 1996-06-10 2002-09-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying and discarding junk electronic mail
US5911043A (en) 1996-10-01 1999-06-08 Baker & Botts, L.L.P. System and method for computer-based rating of information retrieved from a computer network
US6285999B1 (en) * 1997-01-10 2001-09-04 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Method for node ranking in a linked database
US5835905A (en) * 1997-04-09 1998-11-10 Xerox Corporation System for predicting documents relevant to focus documents by spreading activation through network representations of a linked collection of documents
US5870744A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-02-09 Intel Corporation Virtual people networking
US7117358B2 (en) * 1997-07-24 2006-10-03 Tumbleweed Communications Corp. Method and system for filtering communication
US6266664B1 (en) * 1997-10-01 2001-07-24 Rulespace, Inc. Method for scanning, analyzing and rating digital information content
US6163778A (en) * 1998-02-06 2000-12-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Probabilistic web link viability marker and web page ratings
US6233618B1 (en) * 1998-03-31 2001-05-15 Content Advisor, Inc. Access control of networked data
US6473753B1 (en) * 1998-10-09 2002-10-29 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for calculating term-document importance
US6976070B1 (en) * 1999-02-16 2005-12-13 Kdd Corporation Method and apparatus for automatic information filtering using URL hierarchical structure and automatic word weight learning
US6571275B1 (en) * 1999-04-27 2003-05-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering messages in a data processing system
US6249785B1 (en) * 1999-05-06 2001-06-19 Mediachoice, Inc. Method for predicting ratings
WO2000068833A2 (en) 1999-05-07 2000-11-16 Argo Interactive Limited Categorising data
US6675170B1 (en) 1999-08-11 2004-01-06 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Method to efficiently partition large hyperlinked databases by hyperlink structure
US6449636B1 (en) * 1999-09-08 2002-09-10 Nortel Networks Limited System and method for creating a dynamic data file from collected and filtered web pages
US6745367B1 (en) * 1999-09-27 2004-06-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method and computer program product for implementing parental supervision for internet browsing
US6665659B1 (en) * 2000-02-01 2003-12-16 James D. Logan Methods and apparatus for distributing and using metadata via the internet
JP3605343B2 (en) * 2000-03-31 2004-12-22 デジタルア−ツ株式会社 Internet browsing control method, medium recording program for implementing the method, and internet browsing control device
US6772214B1 (en) * 2000-04-27 2004-08-03 Novell, Inc. System and method for filtering of web-based content stored on a proxy cache server
DE10024733A1 (en) 2000-05-19 2001-11-22 Clemente Spehr Blocking data for request from network involves requesting data via Clean Surf Server using predetermined filter criterion and acting as filter to distinguish unwanted data from tolerated data
US6684254B1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2004-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Hyperlink filter for “pirated” and “disputed” copyright material on the internet in a method, system and program
US6854074B2 (en) * 2000-12-01 2005-02-08 Internetseer.Com Corp. Method of remotely monitoring an internet web site
US6941466B2 (en) * 2001-02-22 2005-09-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for providing automatic e-mail filtering based on message semantics, sender's e-mail ID, and user's identity
US7213069B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2007-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Category name service able to override the category name based on requestor privilege information
JP3886362B2 (en) * 2001-11-13 2007-02-28 富士通株式会社 Content filtering method, content filtering apparatus, and content filtering program
JP2003157218A (en) * 2001-11-22 2003-05-30 Funai Electric Co Ltd Portable telephone set and communication terminal device having nuisance mail automatic eliminating function
US7194464B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2007-03-20 Websense, Inc. System and method for adapting an internet filter
JP3871941B2 (en) * 2002-02-22 2007-01-24 日本電気通信システム株式会社 Spam mail automatic disposal method, mail server and program in mail server of mobile phone
EP1482696A4 (en) * 2002-02-22 2006-03-15 Access Co Ltd Method and device for processing electronic mail undesirable for user
US20030163731A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-08-28 David Wigley Method, system and software product for restricting access to network accessible digital information
KR100486821B1 (en) * 2003-02-08 2005-04-29 디프소프트 주식회사 Method for automatically blocking spam mail by connection of link url
US7272853B2 (en) * 2003-06-04 2007-09-18 Microsoft Corporation Origination/destination features and lists for spam prevention
JP2005056048A (en) * 2003-08-01 2005-03-03 Fact-Real:Kk Electronic mail monitoring system, electronic mail monitoring program and electronic mail monitoring method
CA2504118A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-10-09 Opinionlab, Inc. Using software incorporated into a web page to collect page-specific user feedback concerning a document embedded in the web page

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1510945A1 (en) 2005-03-02
KR20050022284A (en) 2005-03-07
JP2005071359A (en) 2005-03-17
CN1592229A (en) 2005-03-09
US7421498B2 (en) 2008-09-02
KR101203331B1 (en) 2012-11-20
CN1592229B (en) 2010-10-06
BRPI0403149A (en) 2005-05-31
CA2475323A1 (en) 2005-02-25
MXPA04007144A (en) 2005-06-08
US20050050222A1 (en) 2005-03-03
JP4847691B2 (en) 2011-12-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2475323C (en) Url based filtering of electronic communications and web pages
US11132508B2 (en) Monitoring conversations to identify topics of interest
US8171388B2 (en) Trust based moderation
US20030236845A1 (en) Method and system for classifying electronic documents
US6941466B2 (en) Method and apparatus for providing automatic e-mail filtering based on message semantics, sender's e-mail ID, and user's identity
US8560706B2 (en) Degrees of separation for handling communications
US20150081825A1 (en) Method for Automatically Unsubscribing an Address from a Subscription
JP2000201170A (en) Priority and secret coding system for electronic mail massage
US8321512B2 (en) Method and software product for identifying unsolicited emails
US7620691B1 (en) Filtering electronic messages while permitting delivery of solicited electronics messages
JP2004516528A (en) E-mail item screening method and system for screening
JP2004500761A (en) System to identify distributed content
US20050177599A1 (en) System and method for complying with anti-spam rules, laws, and regulations
US8001609B1 (en) Method and apparatus for preventing the inadvertent or unauthorized release of information
KR100473051B1 (en) Automatic Spam-mail Dividing Method
WO2006051434A1 (en) A method and system for preventing reception of unwanted electronic messages, such as spam-mails
JP2004523046A (en) System for transmitting message to target and method of operating the same
KR100480879B1 (en) Method for treating spam mail using sender's mail domain and inserted url and system thereof
KR20080069281A (en) System for blocking spam mail and method of the same
Vokorokos et al. Security issues of email marketing service
WO2001004787A2 (en) Method and system for classifying users of an electronic network
KR100580363B1 (en) A Method For Prevention Spam Mail Based On User ID
Schryen The empirical analysis of the abuse of e-mail addresses placed on the Internet
Spam CEAS 2005
JP2003141040A (en) Message reliability determination method, message reliability determination device, message presenting device, storage medium and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
MKLA Lapsed

Effective date: 20220301

MKLA Lapsed

Effective date: 20200831